Popular Articles

Mamata, CPM heat on land, railways in LS
The row between the CPI(M) and its arch rival, the Trinamool Congress (TC), over land refuses to die. After the land acquisition issue played a crucial role in the 2009 Lok Sabha polls in West Bengal, it became a hot topic again today, as the CPI(M) and the TC locked horns during the Railway Budget discussion in the Lok Sabha.

Markets down in early trades
The Sensex opened weak this morning following subdued cues from its Asian peers. The Sensex opened at 16,827 and is now down 61 points at 16,798.

News of the day

Commodity to the rescue
It could be one of those years when exposure in commodity futures, along with equities could be a good investment strategy.
Business Opportunities

Sun Pharma accuses Taro director of misusing funds

Says litigation against Sun is financed by Taro money. - Vijaya Bank targets 22% growth in business - Sun Pharma net profit dips 11.5% - "We are not a topline-driven company" - Sun Pharma profit dips 11.49% - Bhupesh Bhandari: The new pharmaceutical order">Bhupesh Bhandari: The new pharmaceutical order - Sun Pharma rises 2.3% on nod for generic drug Sun Pharmaceutical Industries today accused Taro directors of misusing the company’s money on litigation and said it would hold them accountable once it acquired control of the Israeli firm. Sun Pharma and Taro have been locked in a legal battle after their $454-million merger agreement, signed in 2007, failed to materialise when the latter unilaterally terminated it in May 2008. Since then, the Levitt family, promoters of Taro, have been opposing a takeover bid by Sun. “Of course, as in the past, they (directors) are doing all these (litigation against Sun) using Taro’s money, in which they hold less than 12 per cent economic stake,” Sun Pharma Chairman and Managing Director Dilip Shanghvi said in a conference call with investors. Taro officials could not be reached for comments. In September, Taro had filed another case against Sun Pharma in a US court, alleging violation of non-disclosure agreement and misleading shareholders. Shanghvi said it was yet another excuse by Taro to not honour their agreement. “According to our lawyers, the Taro promoters are afraid of a judgment being pronounced by the Supreme Court upholding the lower court verdict of making one more brazen attempt to potentially create additional excuses for their dishonouring of the signed agreement.” Expressing confidence that Sun Pharma would ultimately prevail in the takeover battle, he said: “Once we acquire control of Taro, we will hold the directors accountable under the provisions of applicable law.”


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):